Neurofilament light (NfL) concentrations in patients with epilepsy with recurrent isolated seizures: Insights from a clinical cohort study.

• Patients from a tertiary epilepsy center in routine clinical practice were studied. • NfL was measured in serum with a highly sensitive single molecule array (Simoa). • The vast majority (94 %) of patients with epilepsy did not have increased sNfL values. • The finding of higher sNfL in males with seizure activity should be interpreted with utmost caution. To detect possible neuronal damage due to recurrent isolated seizures in patients with epilepsy in a clinical routine setting. We measured the serum concentrations of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in 46 outpatients with an at least monthly occurrence (self-reported) of generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the six months prior to the study and in 49 patients who had been seizure free (self-reported) for at least one year. We assigned the patients with seizure activity into groups with moderate and high seizure frequency. We measured sNfL with a highly sensitive single molecule array (Simoa). The majority (94 %) of all patients with epilepsy had sNfL values within the age adjusted reference ranges of our laboratory. Three patients with and three patients without seizure activity (each 3 %) showed elevated sNfL concentrations. Age adjusted sNfL concentrations did not differ significantly between patients with and without seizure activity in the total sample or in the female subgroup. In contrast, NfL concentrations were significantly higher in male patients with seizure activity and highest in the subgroup of those with high seizure activity, but were only above the reference range in two patients. sNfL concentrations did not differ between focal and generalized epilepsies and between genetic and structural etiologies. The sNfL concentrations in patients with epilepsy and healthy patients did not differ significantly. The finding of higher sNfL concentrations in males with self-reported seizure activity should be viewed with utmost caution because the difference was small and only two male patients showed sNfL concentrations above the reference range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]