Superior nitrate and chromium reduction synergistically driven by multiple electron donors: Performance and the related biochemical mechanism.

Nitrate and Cr(VI) are the typical and prevalent co-contaminants in the groundwater, how to synchronously and effectively diminish them has received growing attention. The most problem that currently limits the nitrate and Cr(VI) reduction technology for groundwater remediation is with emphasis on exploring the optimal electron donors. This study investigated the feasibility of utilizing the synergistical effect of inorganic electron donors (pyrite, sulfur) and inherently limited organics to promote synchronous nitrate and Cr(VI) removal, which meets the requirement of naturally low-carbon and eco-friendly technologies. The NO 3 ⁻-N and Cr(VI) removal efficiencies in the pyrite and sulfur involved mixotrophic biofilter (PS–BF: approximately 90.8 ± 0.6% and 99.1 ± 2.1%) were substantially higher than that in a volcanic rock supported biofilter (V–BF: about 49.6% ± 2.8% and 50.0% ± 9.3%), which was consistent with the spatial variations of their concentrations. Abiotic and biotic batch tests directly confirmed the decisive role of pyrite and sulfur for NO 3 ⁻-N and Cr(VI) removal via chemical and microbial pathways. A server decline in sulfate production correlated with decreasing COD consumption revealed that there was sulfur disproportionation induced by limited organics. Metagenomic analysis suggested that chemoautotrophic microbes like Sulfuritalea and Thiobacillus were key players responsible for sulfur oxidation, nitrate and Cr(VI) reduction. The metabolic pathway analysis suggested that genes encoding functional enzymes related to complete denitrification, S oxidation, and dissimilatory sulfate reduction were upregulated, however, genes encoding Cr(VI) reduction enzymes (e.g. chrA , chrR , nemA , and azoR) were downregulated in PS-BF, which further explained the synergistical effect of multiple electron donors. These findings provide insights into their potential cooperative interaction of multiple electron donors on greatly promoting nitrate and Cr(VI) removal and have implications for the remediation technology of nitrate and Cr(VI) co-contaminated groundwater. [Display omitted] • PS-BF exhibited superior and stable removal efficiencies of NO 3 ⁻-N and Cr(VI). • The synergistic effect among pyrite, sulfur and organics was verified. • A higher content of deposited Cr(III) occurred in PS-BF system. • Autotroph like Sulfuritalea and Thiobacillus were players for N and Cr(VI) removal. • Functional genes for C, S, Fe, N, Cr cycles differed in two systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]