Back to Search Start Over

AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management.

Authors :
Verduzco‐Gutierrez, Monica
Raghavan, Preeti
Pruente, Jessica
Moon, Daniel
List, Cassandra M.
Hornyak, Joseph Edward
Gul, Fatma
Deshpande, Supreet
Biffl, Susan
Al Lawati, Zainab
Alfaro, Abraham
Source :
PM & R: Journal of Injury, Function & Rehabilitation; Aug2024, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p864-887, 24p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) conducted a comprehensive review in 2021 to identify opportunities for enhancing the care of adult and pediatric patients with spasticity. A technical expert panel (TEP) was convened to develop consensus‐based practice recommendations aimed at addressing gaps in spasticity care. Objective: To develop consensus‐based practice recommendations to identify and address gaps in spasticity care. Methods: The Spasticity TEP engaged in a 16‐month virtual meeting process, focusing on formulating search terms, refining research questions, and conducting a structured evidence review. Evidence quality was assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC), and a modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on recommendation statements and evidence grading. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) guided the rating of individual studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The TEP approved five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management, with one recommendation unable to be graded due to evidence limitations. Best practices were defined as widely accepted components of care, while recommendations required structured evidence reviews and grading. The consensus guidance statement represents current best practices and evidence‐based treatment options, intended for use by PM&R physicians caring for patients with spasticity. Conclusion: This consensus guidance provides clinicians with practical recommendations for spasticity assessment and management based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Clinical judgment should be exercised, and recommendations tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and risk profiles. The accompanying table summarizes the best practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management, reflecting principles with little controversy in care delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19341482
Volume :
16
Issue :
8
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
PM & R: Journal of Injury, Function & Rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178974071
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13211