Back to Search Start Over

Dynamic Prediction of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors :
Wijnands, Anouk M.
Penning de Vries, Bas B.L.
Lutgens, Maurice W.M.D.
Bakhshi, Zeinab
Al Bakir, Ibrahim
Beaugerie, Laurent
Bernstein, Charles N.
Chang-ho Choi, Ryan
Coelho-Prabhu, Nayantara
Graham, Trevor A.
Hart, Ailsa L.
ten Hove, Joren R.
Itzkowitz, Steven H.
Kirchgesner, Julien
Mooiweer, Erik
Shaffer, Seth R.
Shah, Shailja C.
Elias, Sjoerd G.
Oldenburg, Bas
Source :
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Aug2024, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p1697-1708, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to develop and validate a dynamic prediction model for the occurrence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, including high-grade dysplasia and CRC) in IBD. We pooled data from 6 existing cohort studies from Canada, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Patients with IBD and an indication for CRC surveillance were included if they underwent at least 1 follow-up procedure. Exclusion criteria included prior aCRN, prior colectomy, or an unclear indication for surveillance. Predictor variables were selected based on the literature. A dynamic prediction model was developed using a landmarking approach based on Cox proportional hazard modeling. Model performance was assessed with Harrell's concordance-statistic (discrimination) and by calibration curves. Generalizability across surveillance cohorts was evaluated by internal–external cross-validation. The surveillance cohorts comprised 3731 patients, enrolled and followed-up in the time period from 1973 to 2021, with a median follow-up period of 5.7 years (26,336 patient-years of follow-up evaluation); 146 individuals were diagnosed with aCRN. The model contained 8 predictors, with a cross-validation median concordance statistic of 0.74 and 0.75 for a 5- and 10-year prediction window, respectively. Calibration plots showed good calibration. Internal–external cross-validation results showed medium discrimination and reasonable to good calibration. The new prediction model showed good discrimination and calibration, however, generalizability results varied. Future research should focus on formal external validation and relate predicted aCRN risks to surveillance intervals before clinical application. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15423565
Volume :
22
Issue :
8
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178357347
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.014