Back to Search Start Over

Ethnic variation in lower face anthropometry on facial computed tomography scans for patients seeking facial feminization surgery.

Authors :
Nguyen, Nghiem H.
Taylor, Jeremiah M.
Huang, Kelly X.
Shariati, Kaavian
Chevalier, Jose M.
Miller, Meghan N.
Cronin, Brendan J.
Lee, Justine C.
Source :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery; Jun2024, Vol. 93, p222-231, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is the most common form of facial gender-affirming surgery. One of the current knowledge gaps is the understanding of differences among racial groups in baseline craniofacial norms for transgender and nonbinary patients. All patients who sought consultation for FFS and underwent craniofacial computed tomography (CT) scans at a single institution between 2018 and 2023 were included. Patients who underwent previous facial surgeries were excluded. Chart reviews were conducted for patient characteristics, including race, age, hormone therapy duration, and prior gender-affirming surgeries. Racial categorizations included White, Latinx, African American, or Asian. Patients with other or multiracial identities were excluded. Lower face measurements were derived from preoperative facial CT scans. Comparative analyses were performed on all measurements among the racial groups. In this study, 204 patients were included with an average age of 32.0 ± 10.2 years and a median hormone therapy duration of 2.0 years. The notable differences among the racial groups were: 1. Zygomatic width was the largest in Asian patients (13.5 ± 0.6 cm) compared to all other racial groups (p = 0.03), 2. Nasolabial angle was the smallest in African American patients (82.5 ± 13.1 degrees, p < 0.001), 3. Lower face height was the largest in African American patients (6.9 ± 0.7 cm, p < 0.001), and 4. Lateral mandibular flare was the largest in African American patients (0.4 ± 0.1 cm) and the smallest in Latinx patients (0.2 ± 0.1 cm, p < 0.001). Specific target areas of FFS should be carefully considered to account for possible baseline ethnic differences. Relative facial proportions may also be a more salient surgical planning tool in transgender and gender nonbinary patients rather than absolute measurements alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17486815
Volume :
93
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177601029
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.049