Back to Search Start Over

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors :
Casey, Jack C.
Daher, Mohammad
Dworkin, Myles
Cusano, Joseph
Garavito, Jorge
Gil, Joseph A.
Source :
Journal of Hand Surgery (03635023); Jun2024, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p570-575, 6p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

With variable and conflicting results to date, it remains unclear whether the percutaneous or open surgical A1 pulley release technique is superior regarding safety and efficacy. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the two techniques. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1–20) were searched through August 2023. Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Of the eight included studies and 548 total patients, there were 278 subjects in the percutaneous release group and 270 subjects in the open release group. There was no significant difference between the two surgical techniques in postoperative rates of revision, complications, or pain. This meta-analysis found no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques regarding the need for revision procedures, complications, or postoperative pain. Therefore, both open and percutaneous releases are appropriate. Therapeutic I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03635023
Volume :
49
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Hand Surgery (03635023)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177391759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.010