Back to Search Start Over

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hydronephrosis on Prior Imaging-Unknown Cause.

Authors :
Whitworth III, Pat
Courtney, Kelsey G.
Oto, Aytekin
Allen, Brian C.
Akin, Oguz
Barker, Samantha J.
Bartel, Twyla B.
DuBeau, Catherine
Gerena, Marielia
Kraft, Kate H.
Lew, Susie Q.
Mankowski Gettle, Lori
Turkbey, Baris
Uyeda, Jennifer W.
Nikolaidis, Paul
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology; 2024 Supplement, Vol. 21 Issue 6, pS144-S167, 24p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Initial imaging evaluation of hydronephrosis of unknown etiology is a complex subject and is dependent on clinical context. In asymptomatic patients, it is often best conducted via CT urography (CTU) without and with contrast, MR urography (MRU) without and with contrast, or scintigraphic evaluation with mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) imaging. For symptomatic patients, CTU without and with contrast, MRU without and with contrast, MAG3 scintigraphy, or ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging are all viable initial imaging studies. In asymptomatic pregnant patients, nonionizing imaging with US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging is preferred. Similarly, in symptomatic pregnant patients, US of the kidneys and bladder with Doppler imaging or MRU without contrast is the imaging study of choice, as both ionizing radiation and gadolinium contrast are avoided in pregnancy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177288850
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.020