Back to Search Start Over

Does tranexamic acid effectively minimise blood loss in cleft palate repair? A rigorous assessment through comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Mortada, Hatan
Alsuhaim, Abdulaziz
Almutairi, Faisal Falah
Albalawi, Talal Ahmed A.
Albalawi, Ibrahim Abdulla S.
Alkuwaity, Dana Waleed
Alali, Feryal Khalid
AlMosained, Haya
Shosho, Raghad Yasir
Almanasef, Zainab
Alobaidi, Hussain Amin
Arab, Khalid
Source :
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery; May2024, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p331-339, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Cleft palate repair is a common reconstructive procedure that can involve significant blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proposed to minimise blood loss during various surgical procedures, but its effectiveness in cleft palate repair remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of TXA to reduce postoperative blood loss. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published up to September 2023. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes measured were total blood loss, transfusion rates, and postoperative complications. We identified four relevant RCTs, which included 275 cleft palate patients with a mean (range) age of 28.7 (6–65) months. The pooled analysis found no significant difference in duration of surgery (MD -18.40 minutes, p = 0.09), preoperative haemoglobin (MD 0.46 g/dl, p = 0.27), or postoperative haemoglobin (MD 0.07 g/dl, p = 0.86) between TXA and control groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower with TXA, but with TXA, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -16.63 ml, p = 0.15). TXA significantly improved surgical field visibility (p = 0.004). No adverse events occurred with its use. While no significant differences were found in surgical outcomes with TXA, surgical field visibility significantly improved, and TXA showed a promising safety profile. Larger and higher-quality RCTs are still needed to validate these preliminary findings before TXA can be considered as a standard treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02664356
Volume :
62
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177224753
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.12.019