Back to Search Start Over

Do citizens value climate change mitigation over biodiversity protection? Exploring citizen support for salt marsh management.

Authors :
Gaspers, Anne
Banta, Gary
Veylit, Lara
Vehmaa, Anu
Lanari, Marianna
Quintana, Cintia O.
Jensen, Kai
Boström, Christoffer
Eklöf, Johan S.
Krause-Jensen, Dorte
Leiva-Dueñas, Carmen
Tiller, Rachel
Source :
Ocean & Coastal Management; Jul2024, Vol. 253, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In December 2022, representatives adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). The overarching goal of the agreement is to halt biodiversity loss and restore natural ecosystems – and a much-cited target is the "30x30" target of protecting and restoring 30% of Earth by 2030. Salt marshes are highly productive coastal ecosystems relevant for both biodiversity and climate change mitigation but have experienced historical major losses and are among the habitats in need of protection and restoration. Currently, there is little knowledge about how salt marshes are valued from a societal perspective, which has important management implications. This is particularly the case in the Nordic region where awareness of these habitats is low. Using survey data from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Germany, this study contributes understanding how citizens value salt marshes by examining support for different management initiatives framed as contributing to the goal of either biodiversity protection or climate change mitigation. Generally, both respondents primed with information about the importance of salt marshes for biodiversity and for climate change mitigation were supportive of the management initiatives despite having little previous knowledge of salt marshes. For one initiative, respondents who were informed of the importance of salt marshes for biodiversity were slightly more likely to support the management initiative than those informed about the importance of salt marshes for climate change mitigation. Our study provides guidance for assessment of trade-offs from a human valuation perspective, thus supporting policy makers when considering arguments for salt marsh management within the context of the 30x30 targets for protected areas. • When salt marshes were framed as important ecosystems, there was public support for management initiatives. • Respondents primed with information on the potential importance of salt marshes for climate change mitigation were not more supportive of management initiatives. • Initiatives with the least direct monetary contribution gained the most public support. • Public support for salt marsh management initiatives differed based on country and, in some cases, age and gender. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09645691
Volume :
253
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Ocean & Coastal Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177201496
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107109