Back to Search Start Over

Additional bypass graft or concomitant surgical ablation? Insights from the HEIST registry.

Authors :
Suwalski, Piotr
Dąbrowski, Emil Julian
Batko, Jakub
Pasierski, Michał
Litwinowicz, Radosław
Kowalówka, Adam
Jasiński, Marek
Rogowski, Jan
Deja, Marek
Bartus, Krzysztof
Li, Tong
Matteucci, Matteo
Wańha, Wojciech
Meani, Paolo
Ronco, Daniele
Raffa, Giuseppe Maria
Malvindi, Pietro Giorgio
Kuźma, Łukasz
Lorusso, Roberto
Maesen, Bart
Source :
Surgery; Apr2024, Vol. 175 Issue 4, p974-983, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting is reluctantly attempted. Meanwhile, complete revascularization is not always possible in these patients. We attempted to counterbalance the long-term benefits of surgical ablation against the risks of incomplete revascularization. Atrial fibrillation patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel disease between 2012 to 2022 and included in the HEart surgery In atrial fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia registry were divided into complete revascularization, complete revascularization with additional grafts, and incomplete revascularization cohorts; these were further split into surgical ablation and non-surgical ablation subgroups. A total of 8,405 patients (78% men; age 69.3 ± 7.9) were included; of those, 5,918 (70.4%) had complete revascularization, and 556 (6.6%) had surgical ablation performed. Number of anastomoses was 2.7 ± 1.2. The median follow-up was 5.1 [interquartile range 2.1–8.8] years. In patients in whom complete revascularization was achieved, surgical ablation was associated with long-term survival benefit: hazard ratio 0.69; 95% confidence intervals (0.50–0.94); P =.020 compared with grafting additional lesions. Similarly, in patients in whom complete revascularization was not achieved, surgical ablation was associated with a long-term survival benefit of 0.68 (0.49–0.94); P =.019. When comparing surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization against complete revascularization without additional grafts or surgical ablation, there was no difference between the 2: 0.84 (0.61–1.17); P =.307, which was also consistent in the propensity score–matched analysis: 0.75 (0.39–1.43); P =.379. To achieve complete revascularization is of utmost importance. However, when facing incomplete revascularization at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with underlying atrial fibrillation, concomitant surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization is associated with similar long-term survival as complete revascularization without surgical ablation. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00396060
Volume :
175
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176010559
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2023.12.008