Back to Search Start Over

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of the Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in General Abdominal, Colorectal, Upper Gastrointestinal, and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.

Authors :
Lavikainen, Lauri I.
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Sallinen, Ville J.
Karanicolas, Paul J.
Couban, Rachel J.
Singh, Tino
Yung Lee
Elberkennou, Jaana
Aaltonen, Riikka
Ahopelto, Kaisa
Beilmann-Lehtonen, Ines
Blanker, Marco H.
Cárdenas, Jovita L.
Cartwright, Rufus
Craigie, Samantha
Devereaux, P. J.
Garcia-Perdomo, Herney A.
Fang Zhou Ge
Gomaa, Huda A.
Halme, Alex L. E.
Source :
Annals of Surgery; Feb2024, Vol. 279 Issue 2, p213-225, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To provide procedure-specific estimates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding after abdominal surgery. Background: The use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis represents a trade-off that depends on VTE and bleeding risks that vary between procedures; their magnitude remains uncertain. Methods: We identified observational studies reporting procedure-specific risks of symptomatic VTE or major bleeding after abdominal surgery, adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up, and estimated cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery, stratified by VTE risk groups, and rated evidence certainty. Results: After eligibility screening, 285 studies (8,048,635 patients) reporting on 40 general abdominal, 36 colorectal, 15 upper gastrointestinal, and 24 hepatopancreatobiliary surgery procedures proved eligible. Evidence certainty proved generally moderate or low for VTE and low or very low for bleeding requiring reintervention. The risk of VTE varied substantially among procedures: in general abdominal surgery from a median of <0.1% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a median of 3.7% in open small bowel resection, in colorectal from 0.3% in minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy to 10.0% in emergency open total proctocolectomy, and in upper gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary from 0.2% in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to 6.8% in open distal pancreatectomy for cancer. Conclusions: VTE thromboprophylaxis provides net benefit through VTE reduction with a small increase in bleeding in some procedures (eg, open colectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy), whereas the opposite is true in others (eg, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and elective groin hernia repairs). In many procedures, thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding VTE and bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
279
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175424068
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006059