Delirium following traumatic brain injury in adolescents: Symptomatology and prediction of ability to return to school or employment 1‐year post‐injury.

Background: There is a limited evidence‐base describing clinical features of delirium in youth. What is known is largely extrapolated from studies of adults or samples with heterogeneous etiologies. It is unclear if the symptoms experienced by adolescents differ from those experienced by adults, or the degree to which delirium impacts the ability of adolescents to return to school or work. Objective: To describe delirium symptomatology among adolescents following a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Symptoms were compared by adolescent delirium status and across age groups. Delirium and its relationship with adolescent employability 1 year post‐injury was also examined. Design: Exploratory secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting: Free‐standing rehabilitation hospital. Patients: Severely injured TBI Model Systems neurorehabilitation admissions (n = 243; median Glasgow Coma Scale = 7). The sample was divided into three age groups (adolescents, 16–21 years, n = 63; adults 22–49 years, n = 133; older adults ≥50 years, n = 47). Interventions: Not applicable. Measures: We assessed patients using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV) diagnostic criteria and the Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised 98 (DRS‐R‐98). The employability item from the Disability Rating Scale was the primary 1‐year outcome. Results: Most items on the DRS‐R‐98 differentiated delirious from non‐delirious adolescents. Only "delusions" differed among age groups. Among adolescents, delirium status 1 month post‐TBI provided acceptable classification of employability prediction 1 year later (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.91, p <.001). Delirium symptom severity (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.03, SE: 0.09; p <.001) and days of post‐traumatic amnesia (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.68–1.01, SE: 0.08; p <.001) provided excellent prediction of outcomes for TBI patients in delirium. Conclusions: Delirium symptomatology was similar among age groups and useful in differentiating the delirium status within the adolescent TBI group. Delirium and symptom severity at 1 month post‐TBI were highly predictive of poor outcomes. Findings from this study support the utility of DRS‐R‐98 at 1 month post‐injury to inform treatment and planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]