Comparative Performance of the Digital Clock and Recall™ Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Saint Louis University Mental Status Among Patients in Primary Care.

Background: Digital cognitive assessment solutions can overcome some barriers to cognitive screening in primary care by providing rapidly‐obtained objective insights without requiring specialty‐trained examiners. The Linus Health Digital Clock and Recall (DCR™) is a three‐part test consisting of three‐word immediate verbal acquisition, the Digital Clock Test (DCTclock™), and delayed recall of the three words. Our objective was to compare performance on the DCR to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., 2005) and the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS; Tariq et al., 2006), two commonly used screening tests in primary care. Method: Comparative analyses of DCR, MoCA (Total Score and Memory Index Score [MIS]), and SLUMS results were conducted among 80 primary care patients – 65 years and older presenting for any reason – whose DCR performance was indicative of cognitive impairment. Result: Of the 80 patients (mean age 74.0 [±7.8]; 60% female) performing as impaired or borderline impaired on the DCR, 67 completed the MoCA and 13 completed the SLUMS. Comparison between the DCR and MoCA Total Score included 78% (52/67) concordance for identifying impairment (cutoff <26). While the remaining 15 of 67 patients (22%) had normal MoCA Total Scores (≥26), 13 (87%) missed points in at least one MoCA cognitive domain and 8 (53%) missed points in multiple MoCA domains (often language and delayed recall). Comparison between DCR and SLUMS revealed that all 13 patients receiving SLUMS assessment had DCR scores 0‐1 and SLUMS scores <27 (indicating cognitive impairment). See Tables 1 and 2 for breakdown of MoCA, MIS, and SLUMS stratified by DCR performance. Logistic regression found that DCTclock metrics of information processing (z = 2.00, p =.045) and spatial reasoning (z = 2.82 p =.005) discriminated cognitive impairment on MoCA Total Score (cutoff <26). Overall, ROC analysis revealed good accuracy of DCR to identify MoCA performance (AUC =.84; Figure 1). Conclusion: Screening in primary care using the DCR is feasible, takes less time to administer than MoCA or SLUMS, and shows concordant results with these more established screening tools in detecting cognitive impairment. Future research aims to investigate the criterion validity of the DCR among biomarkers for neurodegenerative disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]