Back to Search Start Over

How can cities achieve accelerated systemic decarbonization? Analysis of six frontrunner cities.

Authors :
Barrett, Brendan F.D.
Trencher, Gregory P.
Truong, Nhi
Ohta, Hiroshi
Source :
Sustainable Cities & Society; Jan2024, Vol. 100, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• Accelerated systemic decarbonization will become a defining feature of climate action planning. • City CAPs fail to adequately address scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. • Economic case for climate mitigation at the city level is often weak or missing. • Recent innovations in terms of local climate budgeting are yet to be adopted widely. • Decarbonization pace shaped by political enabling environment and extent of public engagement. Globally, many cities have pledged to reach net zero emissions by mid-century and formulated climate action plans (CAPs) to pursue this goal. Attainment of net zero requires accelerated systemic decarbonization measures to catalyze fundamental changes across multiple societal systems simultaneously. Yet the extant literature has not conceptually clarified conditions leading to accelerated systemic decarbonization in cities. This research therefore aims to: (1) conceptualize strategies that contribute to accelerated systemic decarbonization at the sub-national level and develop a framework for empirically identifying these; and (2) assess the extent to which CAPs in cities known for progressive climate policies embody these characteristics. This involved examination of evidence from CAPs and related documents in six cities: Copenhagen, Leeds, Oslo, San Francisco, Australian Capital Territory and Kyoto. Findings show that San Francisco's climate actions are the most indicative of accelerated systemic decarbonization. In other cities, although many ingredients for accelerated systemic decarbonization are in place, several missed opportunities to achieve more rapid and transformative decarbonization outcomes were identified. These include lack of consideration of scope 3 emissions and limited participatory governance measures as well as absence of economic planning, climate budgets and financial indicators to estimate the benefits or costs of various climate-mitigation actions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22106707
Volume :
100
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Sustainable Cities & Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173854231
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105000