Functional Outcomes After High-Energy Lisfranc Injuries.

Background: Midfoot fractures and dislocations are infrequent and functional outcomes following Lisfranc injuries have not been well described. The purpose of this project was to explore functional outcomes following operative treatment of high-energy Lisfranc injury. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 46 adults with tarsometatarsal fractures and dislocations treated at a single Level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Demographic, medical, social, and injury features of these patients and their injuries were recorded. Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) surveys were collected after mean 8.7 years' follow-up. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of outcome. Results: Forty-six patients with mean age 39.7 years completed functional outcome surveys. Mean SMFA scores were 29.3 (dysfunction) and 32.6 (bothersome). Mean FFI scores were 43.1 (pain), 43.0 (disability), and 21.7 (activity), with a mean total score of 35.9. FFI pain scores were worse than published values for fractures of the plafond (33, P =.04), distal tibia (33, P =.04), and talus (25.3, P =.001). Lisfranc injury patients reported worse disability (43.0 vs 29, P =.008) and total FFI scores (35.9 vs 26, P =.02) compared with distal tibia fractures. Tobacco smoking was an independent predictor of worse FFI (P <.05) and SMFA emotion and bothersome scores (P <.04). Chronic renal disease was a predictor of worse FFI disability (P =.04) and SMFA subcategory scores (P <.04). Male sex was associated with better scores in all SMFA categories (P <.04). Age, obesity, or open injury did not affect functional outcomes. Conclusion: Patients reported worse pain by FFI after Lisfranc injury compared to other injuries about the foot and ankle. Tobacco smoking, female sex, and preexisting chronic renal disease are predictive of worse functional outcome scores, warranting further study in a larger sample, as well as counseling of long-term consequences of this injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective, prognostic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]