Smarter ways to capture carbon dioxide – exploring alternatives for small to medium-scale carbon capture in Kraft pulp mills.

• Small-scale carbon capture applications can be very efficient. • Oxyfuel combustion in lime kilns require less fuel but more electricity. • Electric arc plasma calcination switches entirely from use of fuel to electricity. • The additional energy demand to capture CO 2 is small. • 4-bar steam could be produced in conjunction with carbon capture. Carbon capture from the calcination process in Kraft pulp mills, also known as sulphate pulp mills, has potential as a part of carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure deployment. Growing concern of climate change is increasing the interest for so-called negative emission technologies (NETs), and large emission points have great potential. However, among other factors, lack of financial incentives, trade-off with investments in existing products, and the necessity of large infrastructure that stretch across country borders, constrain deployment. This study investigates two concepts for carbon capture in combination with lime kilns in Kraft pulp mills: oxyfuel combustion and electric arc plasma calcination. The results from the modelling of six configurations show that carbon capture from the calcination process with these technologies can be made with comparatively low additional energy demand. Sulphate pulp production from Kraft pulp mills, which use lime kilns, is increasing in Europe and in the world. Therefore, there is large potential for capture of CO 2 from these alternative calcination technologies, both as a first step towards and as a part of a large-scale deployment of CCS and bioenergy with CCS (BECCS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]