Back to Search Start Over

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in older adult patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with tri-weekly cisplatin.

Authors :
Fujiwara, Yu
Sato, Yasuyoshi
Hayashi, Naomi
Fukuda, Naoki
Wang, Xiaofei
Nakano, Kenji
Ohmoto, Akihiro
Urasaki, Tetsuya
Ono, Makiko
Tomomatsu, Junichi
Toshiyasu, Takashi
Mitani, Hiroki
Takahashi, Shunji
Source :
Journal of Geriatric Oncology; Jun2023, Vol. 14 Issue 5, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) in the definitive setting. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a screening tool to predict the risk of morbidity and mortality in the older adult. Nutritional management is key during CCRT but the association between prognosis and initial nutritional status in older adults with LAHNC undergoing CCRT remains unknown. Patients ≥65 years old with LAHNC who received definitive CCRT with cisplatin (80 mg/m<superscript>2</superscript> or 100 mg/m<superscript>2</superscript>, every three weeks, three times) between 2012 and 2018 were included. Patients without completion of radiotherapy were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the GNRI (≦98 or > 98). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to identify prognostic factors. GNRI, sex, T and N categories were prespecified as variables for multivariable analysis. The median age of 111 patients (88 male, 79%) was 69 years (interquartile range: 67–71), among which 23 patients had low GNRI (20 male, 87%) and 88 patients had high GNRI (68 male, 77%). Baseline clinical characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. OS was significantly worse in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group (p = 0.048). There was no statistical difference in EFS between the two groups (p = 0.12). Multivariable analysis revealed that low GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.12–8.96, p = 0.029) and higher N category (HR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.58–12.06, p = 0.004) were associated with worse OS. For EFS, the higher N category was significantly associated with a worse outcome (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.16–5.59, p = 0.02). Poorer nutritional status before initiation of CCRT was associated with worse OS in older adults with LAHNC in the definitive setting. The GNRI is a convenient tool for predicting OS in older adult patients with LAHNC treated with CCRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18794068
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164249005
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101523