Back to Search Start Over

Structural valve degeneration of bioprosthetic aortic valves: A network meta-analysis.

Authors :
Squiers, John J.
Robinson, N. Bryce
Audisio, Katia
Ryan, William H.
Mack, Michael J.
Rahouma, Mohamed
Cancelli, Gianmarco
Kirov, Hristo
Doenst, Torsten
Gaudino, Mario
DiMaio, J. Michael
Source :
Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery; Jul2023, Vol. 166 Issue 1, p52-59, 8p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

To compare the rate of structural valve degeneration (SVD) following surgical aortic valve replacement associated with the Trifecta (TF) valve (St Jude Medical) versus other bioprosthetic valves. A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing durability of the TF prosthesis to other valve types, including Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences), Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (ME) (Edwards Lifesciences), and Mitroflow (LivaNova USA) after surgical aortic valve replacement. Random effect pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the incident rate ratio of the composite primary outcome of SVD or reintervention due to SVD. Ten studies with 31,029 patients were included, of whom 6832 received TF, 19,023 received Perimount, 3514 received ME, and 713 received Mitroflow. When compared with TF, ME was associated with lower rates of SVD or reintervention for SVD (incident rate ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92; P =.04). Similarly, at network meta-analysis, when compared with TF, only ME was associated with significantly lower rates of SVD or reintervention for SVD (incident rate ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.97). ME (incident rate ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.47) and PM (incident rate ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.98) were associated with significantly lower rate of all-cause reintervention when compared with TF. No differences in the other secondary outcomes were found. The TF valve is associated with significantly higher rates of SVD or reintervention for SVD than the ME valve, but not the Mitroflow valve. The TF valve was also associated with higher rates of all-cause reintervention than ME and Perimount valves. The underlying mechanism(s) of these findings warrant further investigation. [Display omitted] Summary of the findings of the study. In total 31,029 patients were included across 10 selected studies. The primary outcome of the analysis was structural valve degeneration (SVD) and/or reoperation due to SVD. We found that the Magna Ease (ME) valve (Edwards Lifesciences) is associated with lower rates of the primary outcomes when compared with the Trifecta valve (TF) (St Jude Medical). IRR , Incidence rate ratio; CI , confidence interval; MF , Mitroflow valve (LivaNova USA); PM , Perimount valve (Edwards Lifesciences). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00225223
Volume :
166
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164245664
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.047