Static cutoffs or tables for the diagnosis of hypertension? Effect on identification of organ damage in youths with obesity.

Recently, the European Society of Cardiology task force released a Consensus document (ESC-CD) on pediatric hypertension (HTN) supporting the use of normative tables (age range 6–16 years) for the diagnosis of HTN, while the Hypertension Canada Guidelines (HTN-CGs) proposed static cutoffs. We aimed to assess the prevalence of HTN by ESC-CD or HTN-CGs and their association with glomerular function and left ventricular (LV) geometry in youths with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). Data of 3446 youths were analyzed. HTN by was defined using normative tables (ESC-CD) or static cutoffs of BP ≥ 120/80 in children (age <12 years) and ≥130/85 mmHg in adolescents (age ≥12 years) (HTN-CGs). Mildly reduced glomerular filtration rate was defined by GFR <90 ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Concentric LV hypertrophy (cLVH) was assessed in 500 youths and defined by LVH and high relative wall thickness as proposed by ESC-CD. Prevalence of HTN was 27.9% by ESC-CD and 22.7% by HTN-CGs. The association with mildly reduced glomerular filtration rate was significant only in hypertensive adolescents classified by HTN-CGs [Odds Ratio (OR), 95%Cl] 2.16 (1.44–3.24), whereas the association with cLVH was significant using both criteria: children OR 2.18 (1.29–3.67) by ESC-CD and 2.27 (1.32–3.89) by HTN-CGs; adolescents OR 2.62 (1.17–5.84) by ESC-CD and 2.83 (1.14–7.02) by HTN-CGs. Although static cutoffs may represent a simplification for HTN identification, tables by ESC-CD detect a higher number of hypertensive youths before a clear appearance of glomerular impairment, which offers advantages in terms of primary cardiovascular prevention. • Tables or static cutoffs of blood pressure are proposed for hypertension screening. • Tables provide higher hypertension prevalence than static cutoffs in obese youths. • Both criteria showed an association between hearth geometry and hypertension. • Static cutoffs for hypertension are associated with renal impairment in adolescents. • Tables provide advantages in terms of primary cardiovascular prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]