Back to Search Start Over

Design and pilot implementation for the BETTER CARE-HF trial: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing two targeted approaches to ambulatory clinical decision support for cardiologists.

Authors :
Mukhopadhyay, Amrita
Reynolds, Harmony R.
Xia, Yuhe
Phillips, Lawrence M.
Aminian, Rod
Diah, Ruth-Ann
Nagler, Arielle R.
Szerencsy, Adam
Saxena, Archana
Horwitz, Leora I.
Katz, Stuart D.
Blecker, Saul
Source :
American Heart Journal; Apr2023, Vol. 258, p38-48, 11p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Beart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. However, shortfalls in prescribing of proven therapies, particularly mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy, account for several thousand preventable deaths per year nationwide. Electronic clinical decision support (CDS) is a potential low-cost and scalable solution to improve prescribing of therapies. However, the optimal timing and format of CDS tools is unknown. We developed two targeted CDS tools to inform cardiologists of gaps in MRA therapy for patients with HFrEF and without contraindication to MRA therapy: (1) an alert that notifies cardiologists at the time of patient visit, and (2) an automated electronic message that allows for review between visits. We designed these tools using an established CDS framework and findings from semistructured interviews with cardiologists. We then pilot tested both CDS tools (n = 596 patients) and further enhanced them based on additional semistructured interviews (n = 11 cardiologists). The message was modified to reduce the number of patients listed, include future visits, and list date of next visit. The alert was modified to improve noticeability, reduce extraneous information on guidelines, and include key information on contraindications. The BETTER CARE-HF (Building Electronic Tools to Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations for Heart Failure) trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the alert vs. the automated message vs. usual care on the primary outcome of MRA prescribing. To our knowledge, no study has directly compared the efficacy of these two different types of electronic CDS interventions. If effective, our findings can be rapidly disseminated to improve morbidity and mortality for patients with HFrEF, and can also inform the development of future CDS interventions for other disease states. (Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05275920). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00028703
Volume :
258
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
American Heart Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162441466
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.12.016