Preliminary investigations using Recover Latent Fingerprint Technology on unfired ammunition and fired cartridge cases.

• Recover LFT was compared against Superglue Fuming and Basic Yellow 40 Dye Staining. • Three pseudo-operational trials were conducted using non-groomed natural marks. • Brass and nickel unfired ammunition and fired cartridge cases were investigated. • Results highlight the difficulty with visualising fingermarks on this evidence type. • Recover LFT produced results no worse than currently implemented processes. Previous studies have identified the potential benefit of the disulfur dinitride (S₂N₂) process to operationally relevant substrates. However, the majority of this work was conducted on prototype equipment that had substantial differences to the commercialised system (Recover Latent Fingerprint Technology (LFT)) in terms of design and chemical delivery. This paper evaluates the performance of Recover LFT on a problematic exhibit encountered within a fingerprint enhancement laboratory: unfired and fired ammunition. Three pseudo-operational experiments involving non-groomed, naturally handled fingermarks were conducted on the most commonly encountered types of ammunition used in crime in the United Kingdom (UK). In addition, Recover LFT was compared against Superglue Fuming followed by Basic Yellow 40 (BY40) Fluorescent Dye Staining (a commonly used alternative) to ascertain if the process provides added benefit to fingermark recovery rates. The results show that fingermark visualisation on small calibre cartridge cases remains difficult with few marks achieving enough ridge detail for comparison. However, this paper also shows that the novel Recover LFT process, which is still in its infancy and requiring optimisation, is no worse than currently implemented visualisation processes and is therefore worth further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]