Sense of Belonging and Professional Identity Among Combined Pediatrics-Anesthesiology Residents.

OBJECTIVES: Combined pediatrics-anesthesiology programs uniquely prepare residents to care for critically ill children, but trainees in these combined programs face challenges as residents within 2 specialties. Social belonging predicts motivation and achievement and protects against burnout. The objective of our study was to evaluate sense of belonging and self-identified professional identity of current combined pediatrics-anesthesiology residents. METHODS: All current residents in combined pediatrics-anesthesiology programs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey assessing sense of belonging and professional identity. Open-ended responses were qualitatively analyzed using an inductive coding process and thematic analysis. Likert questions were analyzed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 36 residents completed the survey (89% response rate). A total of 92% of respondents had a lower sense of belonging in pediatrics than anesthesiology (3.32 vs 3.94) and more self-identified as anesthesiologists than pediatricians. Thematic analysis yielded 5 themes 1) the team-based nature of pediatrics results in strong initial bonds, but feelings of isolation as training pathways diverge; 2) the individual nature of anesthesiology results in less social interaction within daily work, but easier transitions in and out of anesthesiology; 3) divergent training timelines result in feeling left behind socially and academically; 4) residents identify different professional and personal characteristics of pediatricians and anesthesiologists that impact their sense of belonging; and 5) the structure of the combined program results in experiences unique to combined residents. CONCLUSIONS: Most residents in combined pediatrics-anesthesiology programs had a higher sense of belonging and self-identification in anesthesiology than pediatrics. Program structure and autonomy had significant impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]