U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, Inc.. The Supreme Court Favors Protecting Government Documents from the Public Eye, Overlooking the Practicalities of Formulating a Biological Opinion Under the Endangered Species Act.

MLA

Hudgens, Samuel. “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, Inc.. The Supreme Court Favors Protecting Government Documents from the Public Eye, Overlooking the Practicalities of Formulating a Biological Opinion Under the Endangered Species Act.” Tulane Environmental Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 1/2, Summer 2022, pp. 229–39. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edo&AN=158297850&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Hudgens, S. (2022). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, Inc.. The Supreme Court Favors Protecting Government Documents from the Public Eye, Overlooking the Practicalities of Formulating a Biological Opinion Under the Endangered Species Act. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 35(1/2), 229–239.

Chicago

Hudgens, Samuel. 2022. “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, Inc.. The Supreme Court Favors Protecting Government Documents from the Public Eye, Overlooking the Practicalities of Formulating a Biological Opinion Under the Endangered Species Act.” Tulane Environmental Law Journal 35 (1/2): 229–39. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edo&AN=158297850&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.