Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of post-acute care for elderly patients with hip fractures.

<bold>Background/purpose: </bold>Hip fractures are associated with physical dysfunction, and poor quality of life in the elderly. Post-acute care (PAC) would facilitate functional recovery in patients with hip fractures after surgeries. Taiwan has proposed a nationwide PAC program for hip fractures since 2017, but little has been known about its effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the PAC program for hip fracture patients in Taiwan.<bold>Methods: </bold>This was a prospective study. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with hip fractures after surgeries were recruited and divided into home-based, hospital-based, and control groups. Outcome measures included pain, physical function (sit-to-stand test, Barthel Index [BI], and Harris hip score [HHS]), and quality of life (EuroQol instrument [EQ-5D]). Direct medical and non-medical costs were recorded. Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) was calculated as the amount of New Taiwanese Dollars (NTDs) paid per BI and EQ-5D unit improvement.<bold>Results: </bold>Forty-one patients participated in this study, with 17, 12, and 12 in the home-based, hospital-based, and control groups, respectively. The home-based group showed significant improvements in BI and HHS compared to the controls (p = 0.018 and p = 0.029, respectively). The hospital-based group demonstrated significant improvement in EQ-5D compared to the controls (p = 0.015). The home-based PAC program demonstrated the best CER for BI (NTD 554) and EQ-5D (NTD 41948).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Both PAC programs would significantly improve the physical function and quality of life in patients with hip fractures. However, the home-based PAC provided the best CER for BI and EQ-5D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]