Back to Search Start Over

Splenic vessels preserving versus Warshaw technique in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Hang, Kuan
Zhou, Lili
Liu, Haoheng
Huang, Yang
Zhang, Hao
Tan, Chunlu
Xiong, Junjie
Li, Kezhou
Source :
International Journal of Surgery; Jul2022, Vol. 103, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is widely used to remove benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms located in the pancreatic body and tail. Both splenic vessels preserving (SVP-DP) and splenic vessels ligating (Warshaw technique [WT]) distal pancreatectomy are safe and effective methods but which technique is superior remains controversial. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent both methods.<bold>Material and Methods: </bold>Major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and The Cochrane Library, were searched for studies comparing SVP-DP and the WT for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy up to December 2021. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the SVP-DP and WT groups. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.<bold>Results: </bold>Twenty retrospective studies with 2173 patients were analyzed. A total of 1467 (67.5%) patients underwent SVP-DP, while 706 (32.5%) patients underwent WT. Patients in the SVP-DP group had a significantly lower rate of splenic infarction (OR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.25; P < 0.00001) and incidence of gastric varices (OR: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.11-0.32; P < 0.00001) compared to the patients in the WT group; furthermore, they had a shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: 0.71; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.29; P = 0.0008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of major complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (B/C), reoperation, blood loss, or operation time.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Compared to WT, SVP-DP should be preferred to reduce splenic infarction and gastric varices, and WT may be more suitable for large tumors. Moreover, considering the shortcomings of retrospective study, a multicenter randomized controlled study with a large sample size should be conducted to verify our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17439191
Volume :
103
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
International Journal of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157561066
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106686