Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.

Elastography researchers have utilized several rheological models to characterize soft tissue viscoelasticity over the past thirty years. Due to the frequency-dependent behavior of viscoelastic parameters as well as the different techniques and frequencies employed in various studies of soft tissues, rheological models have value in standardizing disparate techniques via explicit mathematical representations. However, the important question remains: which of the several available models should be considered for widespread adoption within a theoretical framework? We address this by evaluating the performance of three well established rheological models to characterize ex vivo bovine liver tissues: the Kelvin-Voigt (KV) model as a 2-parameter model, and the standard linear solid (SLS) and Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) models as 3-parameter models. The assessments were based on the analysis of time domain behavior (using stress relaxation tests) and frequency domain behavior (by measuring shear wave speed (SWS) dispersion). SWS was measured over a wide range of frequency from 1 Hz to 1 kHz using three different tests: (i) harmonic shear tests using a rheometer, (ii) reverberant shear wave (RSW) ultrasound elastography scans, and (iii) RSW optical coherence elastography scans, with each test targeting a distinct frequency range. Our results demonstrated that the KVFD model produces the only mutually consistent rendering of time and frequency domain data for liver. Furthermore, it reduces to a 2-parameter model for liver (correspondingly to a 2-parameter "spring-pot" or power-law model for SWS dispersion) and provides the most accurate predictions of the material viscoelastic behavior in time (>98% accuracy) and frequency (>96% accuracy) domains. Rheological models are applied in quantifying tissues viscoelastic properties. This study is unique in presenting comprehensive assessments of rheological models: • We employed experimental data in both the frequency domain (shear wave speed (SWS) vs. frequency) and time domain (stress relaxation) to assess rheological models' performances. • SWS were acquired over a wide frequency range, 1 Hz to 1 kHz, by three independent techniques. • Using the frequency domain analysis, we evaluated how well each model can predict measured time domain behaviors (and vice versa). • This presents wide-ranging experimental proofs as the most comprehensive study of its type in terms of the number of experiments, frequency range, and conjoined assessments of time and frequency domains behaviors, demonstrating the most appropriate rheological model for soft tissues. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]