Back to Search
Start Over
Validity and Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Scoring by Trained Non-Pathologists on Tissue Microarrays.
- Source :
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention; Oct2021, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p1867-1874, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Scoring of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is often done by non-pathologists, especially in large-scale tissue microarray (TMA)-based studies. Studies on the validity and reproducibility of scoring results from non-pathologists are limited. Therefore, our main aim was to assess interobserver agreement between trained non-pathologists and an experienced histopathologist for three IHC markers with different subcellular localization (nucleus/membrane/cytoplasm). Methods: Three non-pathologists were trained in recognizing adenocarcinoma and IHC scoring by a senior histopathologist. Kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement for 6,249 TMA cores from a colorectal cancer series. Results: Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists (independently scored) and the histopathologist was "substantial" for nuclear and membranous IHC markers (K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.67-0.75 and K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.61-0.69, respectively), and "moderate" for the cytoplasmic IHC marker (K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.43-0.57). Scores of the three non-pathologists were also combined into a "combination score" (if at least two non-pathologists independently assigned the same score to a core, this was the combination score). This increased agreement with the pathologist (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript> = 0.74; K<subscript>membranous</subscript> = 0.73; Kcytopasmic = 0.57). Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists was "substantial" (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript> = 0.78; K<subscript>membranous</subscript> = 0.72; Kcytopasmic = 0.61). Intraobserver agreement of non-pathologists was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript>,range = 0.83-0.87; K<subscript>membranous</subscript>,range = 0.75-0.82; Kcytopasmic = 0.69). Overall, agreement was lowest for the cytoplasmic IHC marker. Conclusions: This study shows that adequately trained non-pathologists are able to generate reproducible IHC scoring results, that are similar to those of an experienced histopathologist. A combination score of at least two non-pathologists yielded optimal results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10559965
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 156991103
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0295