Back to Search Start Over

Validity and Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Scoring by Trained Non-Pathologists on Tissue Microarrays.

Authors :
Jenniskens, Josien C. A.
Offermans, Kelly
Samarska, Iryna
Fazzi, Gregorio E.
Simons, Colinda C. J. M.
Smits, Kim M.
Schouten, Leo J.
Weijenberg, Matty P.
van den Brandt, Piet A.
Grabsch, Heike I.
Source :
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention; Oct2021, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p1867-1874, 8p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Scoring of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is often done by non-pathologists, especially in large-scale tissue microarray (TMA)-based studies. Studies on the validity and reproducibility of scoring results from non-pathologists are limited. Therefore, our main aim was to assess interobserver agreement between trained non-pathologists and an experienced histopathologist for three IHC markers with different subcellular localization (nucleus/membrane/cytoplasm). Methods: Three non-pathologists were trained in recognizing adenocarcinoma and IHC scoring by a senior histopathologist. Kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement for 6,249 TMA cores from a colorectal cancer series. Results: Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists (independently scored) and the histopathologist was "substantial" for nuclear and membranous IHC markers (K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.67-0.75 and K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.61-0.69, respectively), and "moderate" for the cytoplasmic IHC marker (K<subscript>range</subscript>= 0.43-0.57). Scores of the three non-pathologists were also combined into a "combination score" (if at least two non-pathologists independently assigned the same score to a core, this was the combination score). This increased agreement with the pathologist (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript> = 0.74; K<subscript>membranous</subscript> = 0.73; Kcytopasmic = 0.57). Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists was "substantial" (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript> = 0.78; K<subscript>membranous</subscript> = 0.72; Kcytopasmic = 0.61). Intraobserver agreement of non-pathologists was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (K<subscript>nuclear</subscript>,range = 0.83-0.87; K<subscript>membranous</subscript>,range = 0.75-0.82; Kcytopasmic = 0.69). Overall, agreement was lowest for the cytoplasmic IHC marker. Conclusions: This study shows that adequately trained non-pathologists are able to generate reproducible IHC scoring results, that are similar to those of an experienced histopathologist. A combination score of at least two non-pathologists yielded optimal results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10559965
Volume :
30
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156991103
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0295