Back to Search
Start Over
Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest: The United States Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.
- Source :
- Journal of Cardiology; Jan2022, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p98-104, 7p
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- • The trend of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) cardiac arrest has worsened over the past decade. • Coronary interventions and defibrillators/ pacemakers had survival benefits. • Ventricular assist devices did not improve mortality rates in NSTEMI cardiac arrest patients. • The trend of coronary intervention and rhythm devices implantation was steady over the years 2009-2018. Literature regarding outcomes of cardiac arrest with associated NSTEMI is limited. We aim to study the predictors and survival outcomes of cardiac arrest patients presenting to the emergency department who were diagnosed with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Data from the nationwide emergency department sample (NEDS) that constitutes 20% sample of hospital-owned emergency departments in the United States was analyzed for the cardiac arrest related visits from 2009–2018. Cardiac arrest was defined by the ICD codes. Out of 3,235,555 cardiac arrests (mean age 64.0 ± 19.5 years, 40.7% females) there were 163,970 (5.1%) patients diagnosed with NSTEMI during the years 2009-2018. Among cardiac arrest patients, the survival for NSTEMI patients was higher than patients without NSTEMI (46.7% vs. 22.7%). These patients were more likely to be males and elderly. Among the predictors for NSTEMI cardiac arrests, hypertension (OR 1.12, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.16, p < 0.001), prior-coronary artery bypass graft (OR 1.20, p < 0.001) were the predominant ones. Cardiovascular interventions were more common in NSTEMI cardiac arrests and were associated with lower mortality rates (p < 0.001). However, trend for coronary interventions remained steady over study years. We observed an increase in prevalence of NSTEMI cardiac arrests with a worsening trend in survival from 2009–2018. NSTEMI was not uncommon in patients with cardiac arrest. NSTEMI cardiac arrest had a better prognosis than patients without NSTEMI. Cardiovascular interventions might have survival benefits. More research is required to identify NSTEMI in cardiac arrest patients and further evaluate the effect of cardiovascular interventions on survival. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09145087
- Volume :
- 79
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 153927526
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.016