Are user fees in health care always evil? Evidence from family planning, maternal, and child health services.

The effect of introducing or increasing user fees for health services in low- and middle-income countries is controversial. While user fees are advocated as an effective means of generating revenue and enabling health service quality improvement, they constitute a financial barrier to access health services for the poorer. This paper contributes to the literature on the demand-side financing in health by providing evidence on the medium-term effects of introducing user fees on the utilisation of family planning, antenatal care, and delivery care services, women's access to health care, and child health status in a middle-income country setting. Using a difference-in-differences identification strategy to establish causality, we find that the introduction of user fees in Egypt had no negative effect on the utilisation of family planning and delivery care services. Further, fees did not hinder women's access to care and did not harm child health outcomes. Positive effects were even observed with respect to the utilisation of antenatal care services. Our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that the potential decrease in demand due to the user fee imposition might have been offset by an increased willingness to pay for a quality of health care that could be, at least partly, perceived as higher. • User fees do not necessarily deter utilisation of and access to health services. • Positive effects of user fees on antenatal care utilisation are observed. • Services with fees may be perceived of higher quality, raising willingness to pay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]