Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes and Complications of Open vs Posterior Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study.

Authors :
Rungprai, Chamnanni
Jaroenarpornwatana, Aekachai
Chaiprom, Nusorn
Phisitkul, Phinit
Sripanich, Yantarat
Source :
Foot & Ankle International; Nov2021, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p1371-1383, 13p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Open subtalar arthrodesis is the standard treatment for subtalar arthritis. Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA) has recently gained increasing popularity due to a shorter recovery time and better cosmesis. However, studies comparing outcomes and complications between these 2 techniques are limited. Methods: In total, 56 patients with subtalar joint arthritis were prospectively randomized to 2 parallel groups to receive either PASTA (n = 28 patients) or open subtalar arthrodesis (n = 28 patients). The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Primary outcome was union rate confirmed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Secondary outcomes were union time; visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form–36 (SF-36), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores; tourniquet time; and complications. Results: Union time (9.4 vs 12.8 weeks) and recovery time (time to return to activities of daily living [8.4 vs 10.8 weeks], work [10.6 vs 12.9 weeks], and sports [24.9 vs 32.7 weeks]) were significantly shorter with PASTA than with the open technique (P <.05 all). Both techniques led to significant improvements in all functional outcomes (FAAM, SF-36, and VAS scores; P <.01 all); however, there was no significant difference between the techniques in these outcomes (P >.05 all). Other outcomes, including tourniquet time (55.8 vs 67.2 min), union rate (96.3% vs 100%), and complication rate, were not significantly different between the techniques. Conclusion: Both open and PASTA techniques led to significant improvements in pain and function in patients with isolated subtalar joint arthritis. Although short-term functional outcomes and complication rates were not significantly different between the techniques, the PASTA technique was better at shortening the union and recovery times. Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10711007
Volume :
42
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Foot & Ankle International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153575718
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211047239