Back to Search Start Over

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Peripheral Artery Calcification: 30-Day Outcomes From the Randomized Disrupt PAD III Trial.

Authors :
Tepe, Gunnar
Brodmann, Marianne
Werner, Martin
Bachinsky, William
Holden, Andrew
Zeller, Thomas
Mangalmurti, Sarang
Nolte-Ernsting, Claus
Bertolet, Barry
Scheinert, Dierk
Gray, William A.
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions; Jun2021, Vol. 14 Issue 12, p1352-1361, 10p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The study sought to compare short-term outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal artery calcification receiving vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) prior to drug-coated balloon (DCB) for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. Endovascular treatment of calcified peripheral artery lesions is associated with suboptimal vessel expansion and increased complication risk. Although initial results from single-arm studies with IVL have been reported, comparative evidence from randomized trials is lacking for most devices in the presence of heavy calcification. The Disrupt PAD III (Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD) randomized trial enrolled patients with moderate or severe calcification in a femoropopliteal artery who underwent vessel preparation with IVL or PTA prior to DCB or stenting. The primary endpoint was core lab–adjudicated procedural success (residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection) prior to DCB or stenting. In patients receiving IVL (n = 153) or PTA (n = 153), procedural success was greater in the IVL group (65.8% vs. 50.4%; p = 0.01) and the percentage of lesions with residual stenosis ≤30% (66.4% vs. 51.9%; p = 0.02) was greater in the IVL group, while flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the PTA group (1.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03). Post-dilatation (5.2% vs. 17.0%; p = 0.001) and stent placement (4.6% vs. 18.3%; p < 0.001) were also greater in the PTA group. The rates of major adverse events (IVL: 0% vs. PTA: 1.3%; p = 0.16) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (IVL: 0.7% vs. PTA: 0.7%; p = 1.0) at 30 days were comparable between groups. IVL is an effective vessel preparation strategy that facilitates definitive endovascular treatment in calcified femoropopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral artery disease. (Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD [Disrupt PAD III]; NCT02923193) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
14
Issue :
12
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150890101
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.010