Back to Search Start Over

Long-term standard sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: a single institution ten-year follow-up.

Authors :
Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana, Sabrina
Pagan, Eleonora
Magnoni, Francesca
Vicini, Elisa
Morigi, Consuelo
Corso, Giovanni
Intra, Mattia
Canegallo, Fiorella
Ratini, Silvia
Leonardi, Maria Cristina
La Rocca, Eliana
Bagnardi, Vincenzo
Montagna, Emilia
Colleoni, Marco
Viale, Giuseppe
Bottiglieri, Luca
Grana, Chiara Maria
Biasuz, Jorge Villanova
Veronesi, Paolo
Galimberti, Viviana
Source :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology; Apr2021, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p804-812, 9p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

In patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+) prior to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), which convert to a clinically negative axilla (cN0) after treatment, the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is still debatable, since the false-negative rate (FNR) is significantly high (12.6–14.2%). The objective of this retrospective mono-institutional study, with a long follow-up, aimed to evaluate the outcome in patients undergoing NAT who remained or converted to cN0 and received SNB independent of target axillary dissection (TAD) or the removal of at least 3 sentinel nodes (SNs). This study analyzed 688 consecutive cT1-3, cN0/1/2 patients, operated at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, from 2000 to 2015 who became or remained cN0 after NAT and underwent SNB with a least one SN found. Axillary dissection (AD) was not performed if the SN was negative. Nodal radiotherapy (RT) was not mandatory. Axillary failure occurred in 1.8% of the initially cN1/2 patients and in 1.5% of the initially cN0 patients. After a median follow-up of 9.2 years (IQR 5.3–12.3), the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 91.3% (95% CI, 88.8–93.2) and 81.0% (95% CI, 77.2–84.2) in the whole cohort, 92.0% (95% CI, 89.0–94.2) and 81.5% (95% CI, 76.9–85.2) in those initially cN0, 89.8% (95% CI, 85.0–93.2) and 80.1% (95% CI, 72.8–85.7) in those initially cN1/2. The 10-year follow-up confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07487983
Volume :
47
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149367051
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.014