Prognostic impact of a ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer.

We performed a validation study to confirm the prognostic importance of the presence of a ground-glass opacity component based on data of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, JCOG0201, which was a prospective observational study to predict the pathological noninvasiveness of clinical stage IA lung cancer in Japan. Among the 811 patients registered in JCOG0201, 671 were confirmed eligible by study monitoring and a central review of computed tomography. Registered c-stage IA lung cancer was less than 30 mm in maximum tumor size, which was classified into a with ground-glass opacity group (pure ground-glass opacity and part-solid tumor) or solid group based on the status of a ground-glass opacity component. T staging was reassigned in accordance with the 8th edition of the TNM staging system. To validate the prognostic impact, overall survival was estimated. Of the cases, 432 (64%) were in the with ground-glass opacity group and 239 (36%) were in the solid group with a median follow-up time of 10.1 years. The 5-year overall survival was significantly different between the with ground-glass opacity group and solid group (95.1% vs 81.1%). The 5-year overall survival was excellent regardless of the solid component size in the with ground-glass opacity group (c-T1a or less: 97.2%, c-T1b: 93.4%, c-T1c: 91.7%). In contrast, prognostic impact of the tumor size was definitive in the solid group (c-T1a: 87.5%, c-T1b: 85.9%, c-T1c: 73.7%). Favorable prognostic impact of the presence of a ground-glass opacity component was demonstrated in JCOG0201. The presence or absence of a ground-glass opacity should be considered as an important parameter in the next clinical T classification. This supplemental analysis aimed to confirm the prognostic importance of the presence of a GGO component based on data of the JCOG study, JCOG0201. Among the 671 eligible patients, 432 (64%) were classified in the with GGO group and 239 (36%) were classified in the solid group according to the radiological central review board. The 5-year OS was excellent regardless of the solid component size in the with GGO group, whereas prognostic impact of the tumor size was definitive in the solid group. The presence or absence of a GGO would be considered as an important parameter in the next clinical T classification. GGO, Ground-glass opacity. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]