Back to Search Start Over

Trends of Prosthetic Joint Infection Organisms and Recurrence for a Single High-Volume Arthroplasty Surgeon Over 20 Years.

Authors :
Yeung, Caleb M.
Suhardi, Vincentius J.
Varady, Nathan H.
Eizember, Shane C.
Lichstein, Paul M.
Maguire, James H.
Chen, Antonia F.
Estok II, Daniel M.
Estok, Daniel M 2nd
Source :
Journal of Arthroplasty; Mar2021, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p1101-1108, 8p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a morbid complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI diagnosis and treatment has changed over time, and patient co-management with a high-volume musculoskeletal infectious disease (MSK ID) specialist has been implemented at our institution in the last decade.<bold>Methods: </bold>We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive TJA patients treated for PJI between 1995 and 2018 by a single high-volume revision TJA surgeon. Microbial identities, antibiotic resistance, prior PJI, and MSK ID consultation were investigated.<bold>Results: </bold>In total, 261 PJI patients (median age 66 years, interquartile range 57-75) were treated. One-year and 5-year reinfection rates were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.7) and 22.1% (95% CI 17.0-27.7), respectively. Microbial identities and antibiotic resistances did not change significantly over time. Despite seeing more prior PJI patients (53.3% vs 37.6%, P = .012), MSK ID-managed patients had similar infection rates as non-MSK ID-managed patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.75, P = .93). Prior PJI was associated with higher reinfection risk (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.39-4.12, P = .002) overall and in patients without MSK ID consultation, specifically (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37-5.65, P = .005). This risk was somewhat lower and did not reach significance in prior PJI patients with MSK ID consultation (HR 1.97, 95% CI 0.87-4.48, P = .106).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>We noted minimal differences in microbial/antibiotic resistances for PJI over 20 years in a single institution, suggesting current standards of PJI treatment remain encouragingly valid in most cases. MSK ID involvement was not associated with lower reinfection risk overall; however, in patients with prior PJI, the risk of reinfection appeared to be somewhat lower with MSK ID involvement.<bold>Level Of Evidence: </bold>Level IV-Case Series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08835403
Volume :
36
Issue :
3
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Arthroplasty
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148773378
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.002