Farmers' environmental perceptions and preferences regarding climate change adaptation and mitigation actions; towards a sustainable agricultural system in México.

• Farmers´ preferences for actions towards climate change were analyzed. • Preferences were related to farmers' ecocentric environmental attitude and farm typology. • Farmers tend to prefer the adaptation actions more frequently than the mitigation one. • Using low polluting emission machinery and new irrigation infrastructure were preferred. • Designing agricultural policy tools should be inclusive and developed at micro level. Climate change compromises sustainable agricultural development. It has deep economic, environmental, and social impacts, particularly on vulnerable rural regions in developing countries where agriculture constitutes the backbone of the economy. This study analyzes farmers' preferences regarding the potential implementation of several mitigation and adaptation actions addressing climate change. Data were collected on 370 farmers in the "Valle del Carrizo" region of northwestern México. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, the farmers' preferred mitigation and adaptation actions were identified and related to their stated attitudes regarding risks using the Multiple Price List (MPL) lotteries approach. Farmers' environmental beliefs and perceptions as key means of understanding concepts of sustainability were related to their preferences. The use of less polluting machinery and investment in improving irrigation infrastructure were identified as the most preferred actions. Environmental opinions reviewed using the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale allowed for the identification of the participants' ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes, highlighting the commitment of most farmers to the sustainable use of natural resources. Agricultural policies should be developed according to farmers' preferences and behaviors. The design and implementation of measures and policy tools addressing climate change should be inclusive and developed at the micro-level considering farm and farmer typologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]