Level of disease and association with health status in patients presenting with claudication from the PORTRAIT registry.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been shown to affect health status and quality of life; however, the disability associated by specific anatomic level of disease is unknown. We evaluated patients presenting with claudication by anatomic level and used the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ), a PAD-specific validated tool, to quantify patients' symptoms, function, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life. The Patient-centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in peripheral Arterial disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) registry is a multicenter, international, prospective study of patients with PAD. Anatomic level of PAD was stratified as follows: aortoiliac only, femoral-popliteal only, infrapopliteal only, and multilevel disease. Health status information was collected at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months using the PAQ. Student t -test, χ ² test, and linear mixed effects models were examined. Anatomic data were present in 623 (48.9%) of 1275 patients: 127 aortoiliac (20.4%), 221 femoral-popliteal (35.5%), 39 infrapopliteal (6.3%), and 236 multilevel disease (37.9%). Groups were similar by sex and race. Baseline PAQ summary scores differed between lesions, with multilevel disease having the lowest (poorest) estimated PAQ summary score (P =.014). Patients with aortoiliac disease were significantly younger, were more likely to be smokers, and presented with higher ankle-brachial index (all P <.05). Almost one-fourth of patients underwent an intervention by 3 months, 83% of which were endovascular. Repeated-measures analyses demonstrated a significant association between anatomic lesion and PAQ scores over time (P =.016), even after adjustment for age, sex, work status, ankle-brachial index, smoking, history of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, and country. Multilevel disease had the lowest adjusted average PAQ summary score over time (63.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.8-65.5) and was significantly lower than aortoiliac (68.1; 95% CI, 64.8-71.4; P =.02) and femoral-popliteal (68.2; 95% CI, 65.8-70.6; P =.002) but not infrapopliteal (66.2; 95% CI, 60.5-72.0; P =.32). Overall, patients with claudication had similar health status on presentation by level of disease, yet patients with isolated aortoiliac disease fared significantly better over time with regard to quality of life and PAQ scores. Subset analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing interventions for aortoiliac disease and multilevel disease, which were primarily endovascular procedures, appeared to improve health status more over time compared with femoral-popliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. No significant benefits were found with intervention for femoral-popliteal disease or infrapopliteal disease compared with medical management. Treatment of aortoiliac and multilevel disease for claudication should be considered by clinicians as it may represent the greatest potential benefit for improving overall health status in patients with PAD. Further studies evaluating intervention compared with medical management alone are needed to further evaluate this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]