Back to Search Start Over

Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.

Authors :
Pontone, Gianluca
Baggiano, Andrea
Andreini, Daniele
Guaricci, Andrea I.
Guglielmo, Marco
Muscogiuri, Giuseppe
Fusini, Laura
Soldi, Margherita
Del Torto, Alberico
Mushtaq, Saima
Conte, Edoardo
Calligaris, Giuseppe
De Martini, Stefano
Ferrari, Cristina
Galli, Stefano
Grancini, Luca
Olivares, Paolo
Ravagnani, Paolo
Teruzzi, Giovanni
Trabattoni, Daniela
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging; Dec2019, Vol. 12 Issue 12, p2460-2471, 12p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The aims of the study were to test the diagnostic accuracy of integrated evaluation of dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) on top of coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) plus fractional flow reserve computed tomography derived (FFR CT) by using a whole-heart coverage computed tomography (CT) scanner as compared with clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). Recently, new techniques such as dynamic stress computed tomography perfusion (stress-CTP) emerged as potential strategies to combine anatomical and functional evaluation in a one-shot scan. However, previous experiences with this technique were associated with high radiation exposure. Eighty-five consecutive symptomatic patients scheduled for ICA were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent rest cCTA followed by stress dynamic CTP with a whole-heart coverage CT scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). FFR CT was also measured by using the rest cCTA dataset. The diagnostic accuracy to detect functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in a vessel-based model of cCTA alone, cCTA+FFR CT , cCTA+CTP, or cCTA+FFR CT +CTP were assessed and compared by using ICA and invasive FFR as reference. The overall effective dose of dynamic CTP was also measured. The prevalence of obstructive CAD and functionally significant CAD was 77% and 57%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of cCTA alone, cCTA+FFR CT , and cCTA+CTP were 83% and 66%, 86% and 75%, and 73% and 86%, respectively. Both the addition of FFR CT and CTP improves the area under the curve (AUC: 0.876 and 0.878, respectively) as compared with cCTA alone (0.826; p < 0.05). The sequential strategy of cCTA+FFR CT +CTP showed the highest AUC (0.919; p < 0.05) as compared with all other strategies. The mean effective radiation dose (ED) for cCTA and stress CTP was 2.8 ± 1.2 mSv and 5.3 ± 0.7 mSv, respectively. The addition of dynamic stress CTP on top of cCTA and FFR CT provides additional diagnostic accuracy with acceptable radiation exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1936878X
Volume :
12
Issue :
12
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141612187
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.015