Back to Search Start Over

Loop colostomies are safe in anorectal malformations.

Authors :
Mullassery, Dhanya
Iacona, Roberta
Cross, Kate
Blackburn, Simon
Kiely, Edward
Eaton, Simon
Curry, Joe
De Coppi, Paolo
Source :
Journal of Pediatric Surgery; Nov2018, Vol. 53 Issue 11, p2170-2173, 4p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Abstract Aim of the study Divided colostomy (DC) has been recommended in anorectal malformations (ARMs) with previously reported advantages of decreasing overflow into the distal limb and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Skin bridge loop colostomy (LC) is a technically easier alternative without an increase in these complications. We report our institutional experience of LC in ARM. Methods Retrospective study (Institution-approved Clinical Audit) reviewing the clinical records of all patients with ARM undergoing stoma formation in a single UK tertiary pediatric surgical center (2000–2015). Data collected included type of ARM, associated anomalies, type and level of colostomy, time to stoma closure, complications and UTIs. Results One hundred and eighty-two (95 female) patients underwent colostomy formation for ARM. The vast majority (171/ 94%) underwent LC; 9 (5%) had a divided colostomy (DC) and 2 (1%) had no available data. The spectrum of defects in girls included rectovestibular (62/65%), rectovaginal (4/4%) and cloaca (29/31%). In boys, 71 (82%) had a fistula to the urinary tract and 16 (18%) presented with a perineal fistula. Urological abnormalities coexisted in 87 (47.8%) patients. Thirty five (21%) patients developed UTIs. Among the 19 girls who developed UTI, 8 had rectovestibular fistula and 11 had cloaca. Of the 16 boys who developed UTI, 14 had a fistula to the urinary tract and 11 had an independent urological abnormality. The mean time from stoma formation to stoma closure was 10 (3–52) months. Complications were reported in 22 (12%) LCs. Fifteen patients (9%) developed a stoma prolapse following LC with 10 (6%) requiring surgical revision. Conclusions This is the largest reported series of outcomes following LC for ARM. LC is easier to perform and to close, requiring minimal surgical access, with comparable complications and outcomes to those published for DC. Type of study Retrospective comparative study. Level of evidence III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00223468
Volume :
53
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
132288399
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.05.022