Back to Search Start Over

Safety of Overlapping Surgery at a High-volume Referral Center.

Authors :
Hyder, Joseph A.
Hanson, Kristine T.
Storlie, Curtis B.
Glasgow, Amy
Madde, Nageswar R.
Brown, Michael J.
Kor, Daryl J.
Cima, Robert R.
Habermann, Elizabeth B.
Source :
Annals of Surgery; Apr2017, Vol. 265 Issue 4, p639-644, 6p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objective: To compare safety profiles of overlapping and nonoverlapping surgical procedures at a large tertiary-referral center where overlapping surgery is performed. Background: Surgical procedures are frequently performed as overlapping, wherein one surgeon is responsible for 2 procedures occurring at the same time, but critical portions are not coincident. The safety of this practice has not been characterized. Methods: Primary analyses included elective, adult, inpatient surgical procedures from January 2013 to September 2015 available through University HealthSystem Consortium. Overlapping and nonoverlapping procedures were matched in an unbalanced manner (m:n) by procedure type. Confirmatory analyses from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program investigated elective surgical procedures from January 2011 to December 2014. We compared outcomes mortality and length of stay after adjustment for registry-predicted risk, case-mix, and surgeon using mixed models. Results: The University HealthSystem Consortium sample included 10,765 overlapping cases, of which 10,614 (98.6%) were matched to 16,111 nonoverlapping procedures. Adjusted odds ratio for inpatient mortality was greater for nonoverlapping procedures (adjusted odds ratio, OR = 2.14 vs overlapping procedures; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.23-3.73; P = 0.007) and length of stay was no different (+1% for nonoverlapping cases; 95% CI, -1% to +2%; P = 0.50). In confirmatory analyses, 93.7% (3712/3961) of overlapping procedures matched to 5,637 nonoverlapping procedures. The 30-day mortality (adjusted OR = 0.69 nonoverlapping vs overlapping procedures; 95% CI, 0.13-3.57; P = 0.65), morbidity (adjusted OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.92-1.35; P = 0.27) and length of stay (-4% for nonoverlapping; 95% CI, -4% to -3%; P < 0.001) were not clinically different. Conclusions: These findings from administrative and clinical registries support the safety of overlapping surgical procedures at this center but may not extrapolate to other centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
265
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
121965550
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002084