Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of postprandial triglycerides in clinical practice: Validation in a general population and coronary heart disease patients.

Authors :
Perez-Martinez, Pablo
Alcala-Diaz, Juan F.
Kabagambe, Edmon K.
Garcia-Rios, Antonio
Tsai, Michael Y.
Delgado-Lista, Javier
Kolovou, Genovefa
Straka, Robert J.
Gomez-Delgado, Francisco
Hopkins, Paul N.
Marin, Carmen
Borecki, Ingrid
Yubero-Serrano, Elena M.
Hixson, James E.
Camargo, Antonio
Province, Michael A.
Lopez-Moreno, Javier
Rodriguez-Cantalejo, Fernando
Tinahones, Francisco J.
Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
Source :
Journal of Clinical Lipidology; Sep2016, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p1163-1171, 9p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background Previous studies have suggested that for clinical purposes, subjects with fasting triglycerides (TGs) between 89–180 mg/dl (1–2 mmol/l) would benefit from postprandial TGs testing. Objective To determine the postprandial TG response in 2 independent studies and validate who should benefit diagnostically from an oral-fat tolerance test (OFTT) in clinical practice. Methods A population of 1002 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) from the CORDIOPREV clinical trial and 1115 white US subjects from the GOLDN study underwent OFTTs. Subjects were classified into 3 groups according to fasting cut points of TGs to predict the usefulness of OFTT: (1) TG < 89 mg/dl (<1 mmol/l); (2) TG, 89–180 mg/dl (1–2 mmol/l); and (3) TG > 180 mg/dl (>2 mmol/l). Postprandial TG concentration at any point > 220 mg/dl (>2.5 mmol/l) has been pre-established as an undesirable postprandial response. Results Of the total, 49% patients with CHD and 42% from the general population showed an undesirable response after the OFTT. The prevalence of undesirable postprandial TG in the CORDIOPREV clinical trial was 12.8, 50.3, and 89.7%, in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( P < .001) and 11.2, 58.1, and 97.5% in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( P < .001) in the GOLDN study. Conclusions These two studies validate the predictive values reported in a previous consensus. Moreover, the findings of the CORDIOPREV and GOLDN studies show that an OFTT is useful to identify postprandial hyperlipidemia in subjects with fasting TG between 1–2 mmol/l (89–180 mg/dL), because approximately half of them have hidden postprandial hyperlipidemia, which may influence treatment. An OFTT does not provide additional information regarding postprandial hyperlipidemia in subjects with low TG (<1 mmol/l, <89 mg/dL) or increased TG (>2 mmol/l, >180 mg/dl). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19332874
Volume :
10
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
118341884
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.05.009