Back to Search Start Over

Is aortic lymphadenectomy indicated in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery? A retrospective study on 261 women.

Authors :
Martinelli, F.
Signorelli, M.
Bogani, G.
Ditto, A.
Chiappa, V.
Perotto, S.
Scaffa, C.
Lorusso, D.
Raspagliesi, F.
Source :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology; Oct2016, Vol. 42 Issue 10, p1512-1518, 7p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of aortic lymph nodes (LN) metastases/recurrences among patients affected by locally advanced stage cancer patients (LACC), treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical surgery. Methods Retrospective evaluation of consecutive 261 patients affected by LACC (stage IB2–IIB), treated with NACT followed by radical surgery at National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy, between 1990 and 2011. Results Stage at presentation included stage IB2, IIA and IIB in 100 (38.3%), 50 (19.2%) and 111 (42.5%) patients, respectively. Squamous cell carcinoma accounted for more than 80%, followed by adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous cancers (20%). Overall, 56 women (21.5%) had LN metastases. Four out of 83 women (5%) who underwent both pelvic and aortic LN dissection had aortic LN metastases, and all women had concomitant pelvic and aortic LN metastases. Only one woman out of 178 (0.5%) who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy only, had an aortic LN recurrence. Overall 2% of women (5/261) had aortic LN metastases/recurrence. Conclusions Our data suggest that aortic lymphadenectomy at the time of surgery is not routinely indicated in LACC after NACT, but should reserved in case of bulky LN in both pelvic and/or aortic area. The risk of isolated aortic LN relapse is negligible. Further prospective studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07487983
Volume :
42
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
118266885
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.004