Back to Search
Start Over
Scenario-based quantitative microbial risk assessment to evaluate the robustness of a drinking water treatment plant.
- Source :
- Water Quality Research Journal of Canada (IWA Publishing); 2016, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p81-96, 16p, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 4 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- While traditional application of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) models usually stops at analyzing the microbial risk under typical operating conditions, this paper proposes the use of scenario-based risk assessment to predict the impact of potential challenges on the expected risk. This study used a QMRA model developed by Health Canada to compare 14 scenarios created to assess the increase in risk due to potential treatment failures and unexpected variations in water quality and operating parameters of a water treatment plant. Under regular operating conditions, the annual risk of illness was found to be substantially lower than the acceptable limit. Scenario-based QMRA was shown to be useful in demonstrating which hypothetical treatment failures would be the most critical, resulting in an increased risk of illness. The analysis demonstrated that scenarios incorporating considerable failure in treatment processes resulted in risk levels surpassing the acceptable limit. This reiterates the importance of robust treatment processes and the multi-barrier approach voiced in drinking water safety studies. Knowing the probability of failure, and the risk involved, allows designers and operators to make effective plans for response to treatment failures and/or recovery actions involving potential exposures. This ensures the appropriate allocation of financial and human resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 12013080
- Volume :
- 51
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Water Quality Research Journal of Canada (IWA Publishing)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 115726406
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2016.034