Back to Search
Start Over
Periodical Literature Bibliometric Analysis: A case study of four International Journals.
- Source :
- Library Philosophy & Practice; Apr2016, p1-24, 24p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1<superscript>st</superscript> "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2<superscript>nd</superscript> "Linguistics and Education" (L&E), 3<superscript>rd</superscript> 'Political Geography' (PG), and 4<superscript>th</superscript> 'Religion' (Rgn). The present paper attempts to evaluate the publications indexed under the database of Science Direct Top 25 hottest Papers journal literature to understand the global approach of research output in four core journals. This is a comprehensive survey work rendering bibliographic records from Science Direct top 25 hottest papers database during 2005-2013, and this paper strenuously tries to give a complete sketch of the evaluation of research outputs. The key findings of the research divulge that, out of a total number of 3300 papers undertaken for the present research work, 900 were taken from 1<superscript>st</superscript> three journals and 600 shared by the 4<superscript>th</superscript> journal "Religion". It is indicated from the study that top 15 authors of all four journals identically contributed 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%), 384 (42.66 %) and 239 (39.83 %) papers to their credit which counts more than one third of the whole contribution except 2<superscript>nd</superscript> journal. In all journals the greater number 79, 76, 72, and 85 percent papers were produced by single authors, while the collaborated papers were only 21, 24, 28, and 15 percent the study unmasks. Considering the authors' institutional affiliation it is ascertained that, the authors' contributed to the journals was affiliated to 153, 152, 169 and 80 unique institutions encompassing intercontinental regions, which again determines maximum number rd of institutional contributors are involved in 3<superscript>rd</superscript> journal, while minimum institutional contributors in 4<superscript>th</superscript> journal respectively. Besides, the geographical analysis indicates the involvement of cross national regions in the research practices is well found considerably benchmarking. Moreover, the study evidently shows that the overwhelming and most productive geographical region contributors' USA shared 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%) and 231 (38.5 %) papers in 1<superscript>st</superscript>, 2<superscript>nd</superscript> and 4<superscript>th</superscript> journal with posed 1<superscript>st</superscript> rank, while UK achieved 1<superscript>st</superscript> rank having contribution 396 (44%) to the 3<superscript>rd</superscript> journal respectively. Resultantly, it could be professed here that, the both regions (USA and UK) are considerably granted as leading productive nations and prolific in the realm of global research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15220222
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Library Philosophy & Practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 115242780