Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized Trial Comparing the Primary Patency following Cutting Versus High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of de Novo Venous Stenoses in Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistulae.
- Source :
- Journal of Vascular & Interventional Radiology; Dec2015, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p1840-1846.e1, 1p
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- <bold>Purpose: </bold>A single-center randomized clinical trial was performed to compare postinterventional primary patency rates achieved by cutting balloon angioplasty and high-pressure balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo stenoses within autogenous arteriovenous (AV) fistulae for hemodialysis.<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>Forty-eight patients undergoing their first angioplasty were prospectively randomized to undergo angioplasty with a cutting balloon or high-pressure balloon 4-8 mm in diameter because cutting balloons larger than 8 mm are not available. Nine patients were excluded after angiography, with seven requiring balloons larger than 8 mm. In the remaining 39 patients, there were 42 stenoses in the following regions: juxtaanastomotic (38%), perianstomotic (38%), midcephalic (9%), and cephalic arch (14%). Patients in the cutting balloon group were younger (mean age difference, 9 y; P = .04), but other demographic variables were comparable (range, P = .08-.89). The mean follow-up period was 8.5 mo (range, 24 d to 32 mo). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare duration of patency. Mann-Whitney rank-sum t test and χ2/Fisher exact tests were used to compare continuous and categoric variables, respectively.<bold>Results: </bold>Technical success was achieved in all 39 patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the postinterventional primary patency rates for the cutting balloon group were 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.75%-82.70%), 27.7% (95% CI, 9.69%-53.48%), and 11.1% (95% CI, 1.38%-34.71%), respectively, compared with 70.0% (95% CI, 45.72%-88.11%), 42.1% (95% CI, 20.25%-66.50%), and 26.3% (95% CI, 9.15%-51.20%), respectively, for the high-pressure balloon group (P < .3 at each interval).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Compared with high-pressure balloon angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty does not improve postinterventional primary patency of de novo stenotic lesions in autogenous arteriovenous fistulae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10510443
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Vascular & Interventional Radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 111141185
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.08.024