Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation.

MLA

Beingessner D, et al. “Biomechanical Analysis of the Less Invasive Stabilization System for Mechanically Unstable Fractures of the Distal Femur: Comparison of Titanium versus Stainless Steel and Bicortical versus Unicortical Fixation.” Journal of Trauma, vol. 71, no. 3, Sept. 2011, pp. 620–24. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31820337c4.

APA

Beingessner D, Moon E, Barei D, & Morshed S. (2011). Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation. Journal of Trauma, 71(3), 620–624. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31820337c4

Chicago

Beingessner D, Moon E, Barei D, and Morshed S. 2011. “Biomechanical Analysis of the Less Invasive Stabilization System for Mechanically Unstable Fractures of the Distal Femur: Comparison of Titanium versus Stainless Steel and Bicortical versus Unicortical Fixation.” Journal of Trauma 71 (3): 620–24. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31820337c4.