Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms.

MLA

Schaafsma JD, et al. “Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Angiography versus Intra-Arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography to Follow-up Patients with Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms.” Stroke (00392499), vol. 41, no. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 1736–42. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585083.

APA

Schaafsma JD, Koffijberg H, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van der Graaf Y, Rinkel GJ, Schaafsma, J. D., Koffijberg, H., Buskens, E., Velthuis, B. K., van der Graaf, Y., & Rinkel, G. J. E. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms. Stroke (00392499), 41(8), 1736–1742. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585083

Chicago

Schaafsma JD, Koffijberg H, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van der Graaf Y, Rinkel GJ, Joanna D Schaafsma, et al. 2010. “Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Angiography versus Intra-Arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography to Follow-up Patients with Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms.” Stroke (00392499) 41 (8): 1736–42. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585083.