Back to Search Start Over

Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.

Authors :
Petraco, Ricardo
Al-Lamee, Rasha
Gotberg, Matthias
Sharp, Andrew
Hellig, Farrel
Nijjer, Sukhjinder S
Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro
van de Hoef, Tim P
Sen, Sayan
Tanaka, Nobuhiro
Van Belle, Eric
Bojara, Waldemar
Sakoda, Kunihiro
Mates, Martin
Indolfi, Ciro
De Rosa, Salvatore
Vrints, Christian J
Haine, Steven
Yokoi, Hiroyoshi
Ribichini, Flavio L
Source :
American Heart Journal; Nov2014, Vol. 168 Issue 5, p739-748, 10p
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians.<bold>Background: </bold>The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed.<bold>Methods: </bold>Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated.<bold>Results: </bold>Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROC(AUC) 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROC(AUC) 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00028703
Volume :
168
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
American Heart Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
103855893
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.022