Back to Search Start Over

Documenting stewardship responsibilities across the annual cycle for birds on U.S. public lands.

Authors :
Sorte, Frank A. La
Fink, Daniel
Hochachka, Wesley M.
Aycrigg, Jocelyn L.
Rosenberg, Kenneth V.
Rodewald, Amanda D.
Bruns, Nicholas E.
Farnsworth, Andrew
Sullivan, Brian L.
Wood, Chris
Kelling, Steve
Source :
Ecological Applications; Jan2015, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p39-51, 13p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

In the face of global environmental change, the importance of protected areas in biological management and conservation is expected to grow. Birds have played an important role as biological indicators of the effectiveness of protected areas, but with little consideration given to where species occur outside the breeding season. We estimated weekly probability of occurrence for 308 bird species throughout the year within protected areas in the western contiguous USA using eBird occurrence data for the combined period 2004 to 2011. We classified species based on their annual patterns of occurrence on lands having intermediate conservation mandates (GAP status 2 and 3) administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). We identified species having consistent annual association with one agency, and species whose associations across the annual cycle switched between agencies. BLM and USFS GAP status 2 and 3 lands contained low to moderate proportions of species occurrences, with proportions highest for species that occurred year-round or only during the summer. We identified two groups of species whose annual movements resulted in changes in stewardship responsibilities: (1) year round species that occurred on USFS lands during the breeding season and BLM lands during the nonbreeding season; and (2) summer species that occurred on USFS lands during the breeding season and BLM lands during spring and autumn migration. Species that switched agencies had broad distributions, bred on high-elevation USFS lands, were not more likely to be identified as species of special management concern, and migrated short (year-round species) to long distances (summer species). our findings suggest cooperative efforts that address the requirements of short-distance migratory species on GAP status 2 lands (n = 20 species) and GAP status 3 lands (n = 24) and long-distance migratory species on GAP status 2 lands (n = 9) would likely benefit their populations. Such efforts may prove especially relevant for species whose seasonal movements result in associations with different environments containing contrasting global change processes and management mandates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10510761
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Ecological Applications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100747031
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0702.1