Back to Search Start Over

Middle-of-the-Night Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and its Association With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Performed the Following Day: An Analysis From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors :
Aronow, Herbert D.
Gurm, Hitinder S.
Blankenship, James C.
Czeisler, Charles A.
Wang, Tracy Y.
McCoy, Lisa A.
Neely, Megan L.
Spertus, John A.
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions; Jan2015 Part A, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p49-56, 8p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to compare in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications for procedures performed by sleep-deprived versus non–sleep-deprived operators. Background To optimize the safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is essential to determine whether physicians performing emergent, middle-of-the-night procedures, and who may be sleep-deprived as a consequence, have equally safe outcomes when performing cases the following day. Methods We used CathPCI registry data to compare in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications for procedures performed by sleep-deprived versus non–sleep-deprived operators using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for within-operator clustering. Outcomes were risk-adjusted using previously validated models for in-hospital mortality and bleeding. Our cohort included 1,509,096 daytime PCI procedures performed by 5,014 operators between 7 am and midnight from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2012. Operators were assumed to be acutely sleep-deprived if they began a middle-of-the-night PCI between midnight and 6:59 am and performed a next-day PCI between 7 am and midnight, and chronically sleep deprived if they had performed multiple middle-of-the-night PCI procedures during the previous 7 days. Results Only 2.4% of all daytime PCI procedures were performed by operators who had performed at least 1 middle-of-the-night PCI procedure earlier that day. In adjusted analyses, when comparing procedures performed by acutely sleep-deprived with non–sleep-deprived operators, there were no significant differences in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 1.12; p = 0.61) or bleeding (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.08; p = 0.19). However, a greater degree of chronic sleep deprivation was associated with a higher adjusted risk of bleeding (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.34; p = 0.007). Conclusions Daytime PCI procedures are uncommonly performed by sleep-deprived operators. We found no signal of increased complications when acutely sleep-deprived operators performed PCI but an increased risk of bleeding associated with procedures performed by operators with greater degrees of chronic sleep deprivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
8
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100381035
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.010