Back to Search Start Over

Resistive Inspiratory Muscle Training in People With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Postma, Karin
Haisma, Janneke A.
E. Hopman, Maria T.
Bergen, Michael P.
Stam, Henk J.
Bussmann, Johannes B.
Source :
Physical Therapy; Dec2014, Vol. 94 Issue 12, p1709-1719, 11p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background. People with spinal cord injury (SCI) may benefit from resistive inspiratory muscle training (RIMT). Current evidence is weak, and little is known about the effect on functional outcomes and long-term effects. Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess immediate and long-term effects of RIMT in people with SCI. Design. This was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting. The study was conducted at 4 specialized SCI units in the Netherlands. Patients. The study participants were 40 people with SCI (15 with motor complete tetraplegia, 16 with incomplete tetraplegia, 8 with motor complete paraplegia, and 1 with incomplete paraplegia) who had impaired pulmonary function and were admitted for initial inpatient rehabilitation. Intervention. Study participants were randomized to an RIMT group or a control group. All participants received usual rehabilitation care. In addition, participants in the intervention group performed RIMT with a threshold trainer. Measurements. Measurements were performed at baseline, after 8 weeks of intervention, 8 weeks later, and 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Primary outcome measures were: respiratory muscle function, lung volumes and flows, and perceived respiratory function. Secondary outcome measures concerned patient functioning, which included health-related quality of life, limitations in daily life due to respiratory problems, and respiratory complications. Results. During the intervention period, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) improved more in the RIMT group than in the control group (11.7 cm H<subscript>2</subscript>O, 95% confidence interval=4.3 to 19.0). At follow-up, this effect was no longer significant. No effect on other primary or secondary outcome measures was found except for an immediate effect on mental health. Limitations. The sample size was insufficient to study effects on respiratory complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00319023
Volume :
94
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Physical Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
99778977
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140079